Home Page
Home PageAbout GCISServicesDocumentsStatementsNewsLinksFAQ
Last Updated: 31-Jan-2008 | Index  | Site mapFeedback | Vacancies |
 
 



CEO
Deputy CEOs
Media statements
Presentations, interviews, other
Budget votes
Briefings to Portfolio Committee
Cabinet statements
Minister
Government communication




Joel Netshitenzhe

Article: Letter from Tshwane


28 July 2000

Sense of perspective about challenges

What is this government about? What is this country about?

These are among the questions that engaged the minds of Directors-General at the first module of the Presidential Strategic Leadership Development Programme earlier this week.

Many had not sat in front of a lecturer in a long time, and such courses can be taxing to one’s concentration.

As such, for some, the most exciting moments would be during breaks, when we could accost the Police Commissioner or Health DG to debate issues that have recently dominated the media agenda.

‘Why are you opening us up to media attack on police statistics’, colleagues would ask Commissioner Selebi. And the more you debated the advisability of publishing figures which include a mugging in a taxi as a cash-in-transit heist, or a handbag snatched in a bank as a bank robbery, the more this drifted towards a chicken-and-egg paradox: should one correct statistics first before publishing, or should one publish while correcting!

In a democracy, there will be as many views as there are trade-offs on the pros and cons. By no stretch of the imagination can a choice on the matter be construed as being about commitment or otherwise to freedom of speech. The process of correcting SAPS statistics started last Monday, and it should be completed within six months. Whether better or worse, what emerges should give us a more reliable base to plan targeted interventions.

Tshwane is abuzz with such self-reflection, influenced in part by recent media discourse. Depending on the analyst, portends of doom can become the stock-in-trade. Consequently, a sense of perspective starts to evaporate.

And so, what is this government about? What is this country about?

A review of government programmes reveals that the projects on basic amenities have been proceeding apace. From a 1998 base of about 2.3-million homes connected since 1994, today 3-million have electricity. It is the same for water (3m to 5.5m people connected); telephone lines (1.5m to 2m), housing (0.6m to that magic 1m mark) and so on.

In its latest data, the Bureau for Market Research (BMR) reports that the income gap between the poorest 20% and richest 10% of South Africans has closed from 1:45 in 1991 to 1:22 in 1999.

But, are these programmes impacting in an integrated way on people’s conditions of life? Are public managers translating policy into action plans with the necessary urgency – and why should millions of Rand from the Budget go unspent! Have we mastered the intricacies of government regulations – and why did the Command Centre on flood relief take longer than desired to become fully operational! Many such questions, including debate on the 13th International AIDS Conference.

Indeed, what is this country about?

We need to examine the essence of issues without the emotion of media glitz and the enticement of powerful interest groups. We should see beyond condemnations of government that are as easily made in front of an AIDS Conference gallery as they are amended. And there are income projections by some companies, made on the basis of assumptions about Africa’s willingness to buy expensive drugs, even if it meant massive foreign debt.

All this speaks to resilience in the face of pressure. It is about distilling the essence: a Conference that succeeded to focus on the reality facing developing countries, including drug prices, the environment of poverty, progress in the science rather than narrowly on the emotion of mother-to-child transmission, issues of vaccine research and so on.

The attempt at getting President Thabo Mbeki to repeat after an elite was as cheap as the ensuing condemnation which found resonance in some media.

But this will not stop the planned discussion between government and scientists on the promising results of recent tests on drugs to prevent mother-to-child transmission. It will not stop the campaign by partners in the SA National AIDS Council asserting that there is hope if we change lifestyles and care for the affected.

It will not subtract from statistics suggesting that the infection rate in SA may be stabilising. Neither will it change the fact that most developed countries, including the recent G8 Summit, have come to appreciate the African context to the pandemic, and are calling for a fight against HIV/AIDS within the milieu of other killer diseases and the conditions of poverty that encourage its spread.

There is no doubt that government and partners in the fight against HIV/AIDS can do much better. We should improve our efforts without losing a sense of what we are about as a government and as a country.

And we wilt in the face of pressure at our own peril – a betrayal of not only ourselves, but of those who seek the best for humanity.

Joel Netshitenzhe
CEO, Government Communications (GCIS)
Published in Independent Newspapers

top

 

Home | About  GCIS | Services | Documents & publications | Speeches & statements | News & events | Links | FAQ | Feedback


Designed and maintained by GCIS © 2002.
About the site | Webmaster | Disclaimer