Joel Netshitenzhe
Article: Letter from Tshwane
30 June 2000
Survival in the global jungle
An evening
game drive with members of the International Investment
Council (IIC) at Malamala Game Reserve, and we come
across a pride of 5 lions, too young to carve up their
own territory and too old to remain in their original
pride. They had been stalking, in fits and starts,
a 300-strong herd of buffalo.
The game
ranger says the lions would be left to die if they
cannot make headway in their hunt. Rangers do not
intervene. This is the stuff of natural selection
and survival of the fittest.
In a sense,
the debates about the economy among ourselves, and
recently, at the Durban World Economic Forum meeting
and the IIC lekgotla are about survival in a cruel
environment.
In the current
economic system, individuals and nations have to more
rigorously identify and pursue opportunities. But
like any jungle, the global market can marginalize
and destroy. Contained in its wonders is what Professor
Manuel Castells calls a fourth world: "black
holes in informational capitalism: regions where [there
is] no escape from suffering and deprivation".
With the
new trade regime, the speed and size of short-term
capital flows and massive trade in derivatives, systemic
risk hangs like the Sword of Damocles over all economies.
When massive crashes occur, they devastate even those
who play by the rules.
The defining
fallacy of assumptions common to South African discourse
is the belief that financial markets ensure, as a
rule, that price approximates intrinsic value. Perhaps
this does happen in the long-run. But bubbles do feed
upon themselves; "news" is not only misinterpreted
it can also be invented to improve speculators
margins. Even if the causes of volatility are patently
wrong, inertia sets in, and a stock or currency price
can for months veer away from its underlying value.
"Irrational
exuberance" or pessimism can become the norm,
particularly among an excitable crowd in a warehouse,
some trading one stock up to 50 times in a day. They
deal in trillions of Dollars, with profound consequences
for small open economies such as ours. Healthy fundamentals
are unable to withstand the consequences of such gambling.
It is therefore
not a matter of ideology to search for a system of
global governance with appropriate jurisprudence to
obviate this, including the possibility of a world-based
system of taxation for short-term capital flows.
We also
need critically to interrogate the state of our own
stock market: the need to improve technical efficiency,
eliminate leniency towards insider trading and improve
overall governance at the JSE.
Then there
is the question of how society handles "news".
General negativity will naturally produce a bearish
market with only spurts of bullishness. Pessimistic
interpretations of developments, as happened with
the $/Rand exchange rate during the upheavals in Zimbabwe,
has the same impact. Unfortunately, in many instances,
the judge, the juror and the executioner are all wrapped
in one, with their own strong views on details of
politcal policy.
This is
aptly shown by what has become a trend in the analysis
leaving aside methodology of the Business
Confidence Index by the new leadership of SACOB. Be
it inflation-targeting, or the nebulous "investor-friendly
business climate", the monthly release of BCI
has become a platform for aiming pot-shots at government.
IIC members
drew attention to this negative mindset among South
African colleagues and the media. On HIV/AIDS, affirmative
action and other issues, they were astounded at this
"perceptions deficit".
South Africa
also requires boldness in examining the allocation
of capital for productive purposes. Recent figures
on private and public capital expenditure are not
impressive at all. Incentives to investors are not
much help; neither is the ratcheting of ideological
positions on faster privatisation, small government
and confrontational labour relations.
Large FDI
will flow in, especially if South Africans show confidence
in their own economy. In examining this issue, there
should be no holy cows. A different attitude is required
regarding credit allocation and venture capital. Many
here in Tshwane believe that exploration of prescribed
assets or an equivalent instrument should not be treated
as taboo. The challenge is to ensure joint commitment
to project identification, public-private partnerships
and risk management. Further, South Africa requires
focussed companies with clear competency areas rather
than unwieldy conglomerates.
Back to
Malamala: what is most encouraging about this engagement
is the commitment of leaders with very large companies
to run, to act as ambassadors for South Africa abroad.
On arrival
at Waterkloof Airbase, a colleague whispers that the
lions had, that morning, successfully pounced on one
of the buffaloes. So they have survived another day.
Perhaps they will grow, and carve up their own territory.
But the
survival of any section of humanity cannot be left
to chance.
Joel Netshitenzhe CEO, Government Communications (GCIS)
Published in Independent Newspapers
top |